Naturally all criminals are liable for their crimes, and should be punished appropriately. But immigration is a MANUFACTURED crisis, and one's ire should be mainly directed at those manufacturing it.
It's an effective tool for dismantling a society.
People are encouraged to emigrate by terrorising them in their home country.
It's not immigration itself that is the threat: it is the RATE of immigration. If people are left alone they are usually happy where they are and very few are motivated to move. By creating a crisis in the country of origin people can be encouraged to emigrate.
Firstly the effect of high immigration is to ruin the cultural values of a society by diluting them, faster than ideas can slowly form a cultural equilibrium, as people with different backgrounds learn to adapt to each other over centuries.
Secondly, by importing people with no means of supporting themselves, they inevitably have to turn to crime.
Thirdly, by encouraging countries to export their scumbags, crime is increased in the target country.
Fourthly, it makes a convenient "divide and conquer" device: whilst any normal person can understand BOTH that
- people should have genuine charitable concern for those in genuine need; AND
- people will understand the dangers of too rapid immigration.
But the propagandists will present this as a false dichotomy - that you can only believe EITHER that immigrants are the problem and one should have no sympathy , OR that one should have sympathy and people who see the problem presented by immigrants have to be racists, and people who believe the other are your enemy.
(Incidentally, it's not just people arriving illegally, but (in the UK e.g.) the legal immigrants far exceed them).
It's not a new playbook. This is how the war in Vietnam was started. With a simple, ancient, peasant subsistence farming society, it's difficult to find issues to divide and conquer. So "special" squads of Green Berets terrorised the peasants of North Vietnam; then, when they were desperate, 1.1 million of them were exported by air and sea to the *South* of South Vietnam. There, with no means of supporting themselves they would inevitably resort to theft to feed themselves and their families. Then a new puppet regime was installed to cope with the conflict between the locals and the Vietcong.
Problem;
Reaction;
Solution.
I'm concerned that repeating all the memes presenting immigrants as the source of the problem is helping the "Two minutes hate" - the divide and conquer - the "look over there whilst we destroy you".
Sure, immigrants ARE a problem, but it's the globalists that are the SOURCE of that problem:
- using terrorism they created in the emigrants the motivation to move;
- they facilitated the transport and entry;
- they increase anger at the immigrants by treating them ridiculously favourably.
Keep your eye on the ball, and don't be distracted. It's the globalists that are your enemy, not the immigrants.
Yes, Mayorkas in particular should be tried and hanged for orchestrating the invasion of America.
The Democratic Party used to be on the side of American workers. How did they change so completely?
And it really was a deliberate flooding of the US. DHS reports that 8% of Nicaragua's entire population entered the U.S. illegally during the Biden administration, as well as 7% of Cuba's population, 6% of Haiti's, and 5% of Honduras'. These are crazy numbers, wholesale population transfer.
No. 20: Yep, that how it went in the 1900s and was part of what paid the ground for the (attempted and sometimes succesful) Marxist revolutions in Europe. No such luck this time, it seems.
No. 27: Is the 6 000 000-and-change sum real, or just a case of cosmic irony, given who the group paying the bribe is?
I like your memes, and I'd like to point out that those referring to "Pope Leo" are inaccurate, since there has not been a canonically-elected Pope, since Pius XII died in 1958. Those seen as popes since then were/ are actually anti-Popes.
The immediate rule not followed regards the election laws, which the cardinals of the 1958 conclave disregarded and violated, when electing Angelo Roncalli, who was not eligible for the papacy. He was a known heretic, belonged to a secret society, and openly campaigned for his election (also forbidden). His works after usurping the papacy give clues to his perfidy and disdain for God and His Church.
All of the cardinals who elected Roncalli, and those bishops who did not at least protest the installation of him lost their offices in the Church. But, that did not deter the betrayers of Christ--after Roncalli's death, they proceeded to elect Giovanni B. Montini, who was probably the worst of the modern anti-Popes. And so on.
What a beautiful set of memes. Well done sir, well done.
Thank you!
Regarding the memes about immigrants ...
Naturally all criminals are liable for their crimes, and should be punished appropriately. But immigration is a MANUFACTURED crisis, and one's ire should be mainly directed at those manufacturing it.
It's an effective tool for dismantling a society.
People are encouraged to emigrate by terrorising them in their home country.
It's not immigration itself that is the threat: it is the RATE of immigration. If people are left alone they are usually happy where they are and very few are motivated to move. By creating a crisis in the country of origin people can be encouraged to emigrate.
Firstly the effect of high immigration is to ruin the cultural values of a society by diluting them, faster than ideas can slowly form a cultural equilibrium, as people with different backgrounds learn to adapt to each other over centuries.
Secondly, by importing people with no means of supporting themselves, they inevitably have to turn to crime.
Thirdly, by encouraging countries to export their scumbags, crime is increased in the target country.
Fourthly, it makes a convenient "divide and conquer" device: whilst any normal person can understand BOTH that
- people should have genuine charitable concern for those in genuine need; AND
- people will understand the dangers of too rapid immigration.
But the propagandists will present this as a false dichotomy - that you can only believe EITHER that immigrants are the problem and one should have no sympathy , OR that one should have sympathy and people who see the problem presented by immigrants have to be racists, and people who believe the other are your enemy.
(Incidentally, it's not just people arriving illegally, but (in the UK e.g.) the legal immigrants far exceed them).
It's not a new playbook. This is how the war in Vietnam was started. With a simple, ancient, peasant subsistence farming society, it's difficult to find issues to divide and conquer. So "special" squads of Green Berets terrorised the peasants of North Vietnam; then, when they were desperate, 1.1 million of them were exported by air and sea to the *South* of South Vietnam. There, with no means of supporting themselves they would inevitably resort to theft to feed themselves and their families. Then a new puppet regime was installed to cope with the conflict between the locals and the Vietcong.
Problem;
Reaction;
Solution.
I'm concerned that repeating all the memes presenting immigrants as the source of the problem is helping the "Two minutes hate" - the divide and conquer - the "look over there whilst we destroy you".
Sure, immigrants ARE a problem, but it's the globalists that are the SOURCE of that problem:
- using terrorism they created in the emigrants the motivation to move;
- they facilitated the transport and entry;
- they increase anger at the immigrants by treating them ridiculously favourably.
Keep your eye on the ball, and don't be distracted. It's the globalists that are your enemy, not the immigrants.
Yes, Mayorkas in particular should be tried and hanged for orchestrating the invasion of America.
The Democratic Party used to be on the side of American workers. How did they change so completely?
And it really was a deliberate flooding of the US. DHS reports that 8% of Nicaragua's entire population entered the U.S. illegally during the Biden administration, as well as 7% of Cuba's population, 6% of Haiti's, and 5% of Honduras'. These are crazy numbers, wholesale population transfer.
No. 20: Yep, that how it went in the 1900s and was part of what paid the ground for the (attempted and sometimes succesful) Marxist revolutions in Europe. No such luck this time, it seems.
No. 27: Is the 6 000 000-and-change sum real, or just a case of cosmic irony, given who the group paying the bribe is?
Lol, didn't notice that number.
Thank you for the chuckles, Patrick
The Jesus one with the cigarette was GOLD!
I like your memes, and I'd like to point out that those referring to "Pope Leo" are inaccurate, since there has not been a canonically-elected Pope, since Pius XII died in 1958. Those seen as popes since then were/ are actually anti-Popes.
Haven't heard this. What rule was no longer followed after 1958?
The immediate rule not followed regards the election laws, which the cardinals of the 1958 conclave disregarded and violated, when electing Angelo Roncalli, who was not eligible for the papacy. He was a known heretic, belonged to a secret society, and openly campaigned for his election (also forbidden). His works after usurping the papacy give clues to his perfidy and disdain for God and His Church.
All of the cardinals who elected Roncalli, and those bishops who did not at least protest the installation of him lost their offices in the Church. But, that did not deter the betrayers of Christ--after Roncalli's death, they proceeded to elect Giovanni B. Montini, who was probably the worst of the modern anti-Popes. And so on.